|
Through this Manual, contract requirements and
otherwise, Dana strives to clearly define the
expectations of its suppliers, provide a process
to deliver on these expectations and a method
for corrective action where expectations are not
achieved.
5.1 Non-Conformance determination:
Non
conformity is defined as the non conformance of
PPAP or Production approved parts to one or more
of the following documented requirements-
-
Print dimensions.
-
Material Specifications.
-
Engineering Specifications.
-
Packaging Specifications.
-
Mixed/wrong parts within a
shipment.
-
Improper identification of parts.
-
Failure of a part to perform
during the warranty period Dana has extended to
their end customers due to a supplier created
discrepancy.
5.2 Non-Conforming Material Parts Per Million
(PPM) determination: The PPM assigned to a
supplier for non-conforming quantities is
determined by the number of discrepant pieces
contained within a part shipment to a Dana
facility with the following clarifications –
-
One or multiple discrepancies on a
part constitutes one defective piece.
-
“Bulk Material” discrepancies are
classified in the units the material is ordered
(kg, Liters, lbs, etc…).
-
Labeling issues will be defined as
one defective piece per incorrect label.
-
Mixed parts will be defined as the
number of wrong parts found in each correctly
labeled container.
-
The entire quantity of deviated
parts will be considered discrepant unless the
supplier has sorted the shipment to identify the
number of pieces to be covered by the deviation.
-
Exception: if a supplier notifies
Dana of a defect, prior to its receipt by Dana,
and requests the material be returned then none
of the parts will be considered defective.
-
Exception: if the deviation
becomes a Dana print change then none of the
deviated parts will be considered discrepant.
-
If discrepant material is sorted,
the rejection quantities are updated based on
the sort results at Dana or supplier facility.
5.3 Supplier Notification of a Non-Conformance:
When a supplier non-conformance has been
identified a Supplier Corrective Action Request
(SCAR) will be generated. This notification will
include the requirements for containment,
material, response timing and the appropriate
documents if a Dana end customer format for
containment results is the required.
5.4 Supplier Initial response to a SCAR:
Suppliers are required to update the SCAR and
provide an initial response within 24 hours of
notification. The initial response must include
your containment actions from your organizations
current production controls, dock audits and
containment actions as well as all other Dana or
Dana end customer specified containment
requirements.
5.5 Restricted Shipping:
Where Restricted
Shipping is required, the receiving Dana
facility will initiate the Restricted Shipping
Process. The Restricted Shipping notification
letter will delineate the supplier’s
responsibilities in relation to establishing the
Restricted Shipping Process and the criteria to
exit the process.
5.5.1 Restricted Shipping Level I
is a
requirement that a supplier put in place an
additional 100% containment process at the
supplying location to contain for specific
and/or specified non-conformances. The supplier
must isolate Dana from the receipt of
non-conforming material. The additional 100%
containment is enacted by the supplier’s
employees, unless an alternative approach is
approved by Dana, and must be in addition to
your normal production process controls.
5.5.2 Restricted Shipping Level II
is a
requirement that a supplier put in place a
certified 3rd party (approved by the
initiating Dana facility) containment process to
contain for a specific non-conformance, while
implementing a root cause and corrective action
problem solving process. The root cause
identification and implemented corrective action
must be verified as effective by the certified 3rd
party. The 3rd party containment is
in addition to your normal production process
controls as well as Restricted Shipping Level I
containment activities.
5.6 Root Cause(s) and Solution Identification:
It is the supplier’s responsibility to
confirm the root cause(s) of the discrepancy
identified and identify effective solutions to
eliminate the true root cause(s). There are many
potential tools to assist your organization with
this including (but not limited to);
brainstorming, 5 why analysis, capability
(quality) index, control chart, decision matrix,
design error-proofing / process
mistake-proofing, design of experiments,
histogram, hypothesis testing, linear regression
analysis, run and trend charts and design /
process failure mode effects analysis.
Although Dana does not prescribe a specific root
cause analysis method, your organization shall
demonstrate root cause validation on your SCAR
response. Dana representatives shall be
permitted to review the submitted root cause
validation. Where, in Dana’s opinion, the
measurement and analysis plan does not clearly
validate the potential root cause(s), Dana may
reject your response to the SCAR.
Where root cause(s) have been effectively
validated, as determined by Dana and /or the end
customer, your organization is responsible for
proposing a plan to implement permanent
solutions and verify their effectiveness. Where
proposed changes impact the design or the PPAP
approved processing of a product a
SupplierChange /
Deviation Request
shall be
generated, referencing the SCAR number. (
reference the Change Management requirements
section of this Manual).
If your proposed plan is rejected, your
organization is responsible for providing
alternative plans to provide conforming
material.
5.7 Permanent Solution Implementation:
Once
approved, your organization is responsible for
implementing the proposal. The SCAR shall be
updated by your organization to indicate
progress. Dana will monitor the progress based
on milestones on the planned activities. Where
assistance is required to achieve the plan, the
plan cannot be implemented as defined or will
not solve the original problem, your
organization shall notify Dana before due dates
are compromised.
5.8 Permanent Solution Effectiveness and
System Changes: Your organization is
responsible for providing evidence of the
effectiveness of the corrective action to
prevent or control the root cause(s) on the
non-conformity. This evidence shall be included
in the SCAR response. Where the evidence
provided does not clearly indicate the problem
has been solved, your organization will be
notified to include additional or more
comprehensive evidence.
Your organization shall include the updates to
their Failure Mode and Effects analysis and
Control Plan as part of the evidence in the SCAR
response.
5.9 System Wide Deployment:
Your organization
is responsible for identifying areas in their
organization that may share similar process
characteristics (failure modes) that may benefit
from the permanent corrective actions applied in
response to a known non-conformity.
5.10 Non-Conformance Costs:
Suppliers shall be
responsible for any and all damages or costs
incurred by Dana and/or its end customers as a
result of suppliers’ supply of non-conforming
goods including a reasonable administration fee.
All actual charges will be documented in the
SCAR and/or related debit memo.
5.11 Supplier Improvement Process:
Suppliers
with ineffective problem solving processes,
multiple high quantity rejections and/or
multiple quality incidents will be required to
participate in a Supplier Development
Improvement Process, the elements of which will
be determined by Dana in its reasonable
discretion. Suppliers are required to develop a
plan (including a schedule for timely response)
to address their deficiencies for Dana’s review
and approval prior to implementation of
corrective action.
|