|
Dana
strives to clearly define the expectations of
its suppliers, provide a process to deliver on
these expectations and a method for corrective
action where expectations are not achieved.
These expectations define how all Suppliers
contribute to increasing the ability of the
extended enterprise to continually improve the
value we provide to our customers and society.
An understood responsibility of the supply base
is to actively contribute to help define these
expectations in the effort to eliminate waste
and reduce variation in our products and
processes.
The Problem Solving Process provides a
comprehensive checklist of actions to be
considered for each of the steps or phases of
developing corrective and preventive actions for
a problem. The process also recommends data
collection and analysis tools to be used at each
step to assure the process actions are based on
facts and root cause is addressed and the
solution is proven effective. In summary the
steps are:
A.
Identify Concerns
B.
Non-Conformance Initiation
C.
Notify Supplier of Corrective Action Request
D.
Initial Response and Containment
E.
Measurement and Analysis to Validate Root
Cause(s)
F.
Plan and Execute Implementation of Permanent
Solution
G.
Verify Effectiveness of Permanent Solution and
System Changes
H.
Develop Roll-Out Plan to Similar Processes and
Suppliers
I.
Standard Charge back for Non-Conformance
A. Identify Concerns
A concern is defined as an undesirable effect
experienced by Dana or its customers. Concerns
can be identified by anyone within Dana.
Concerns can be applied to the quality of
production parts, their delivery, packaging,
supporting information (such as Production Part
Approval Process documents, Corrective Action
Requests, Capability Reports, etc.).
The Concern shall include a description of the
suspected non-conformance, its type (product,
delivery or information), its effect and its
relative severity to Dana or its customers. The
help documentation on the Concern Record
provides additional details on the form.
Completed Concern Records are sent to the Plant
Supplier Quality activity or Purchasing /
Supplier Development.
B. Non-Conformance Determination
The Concern Records are reviewed by the
appropriate discipline and organizational level
dependant on the effect and severity of the
concern. The purpose of this review is to
determine if the concern is a result of a
non-conformance with stated requirements,
standards, or specifications.
Where a concern is determined to be a
non-conformance, a Corrective Action Request (CAR,SCAR,
DMR, NCMR) will be generated. The Plant
Supplier Quality will initiate Correction Action
Requests for non-conformities that are within
the scope of their respective facility. The
Supplier Development or the Buyer will initiate
Corrective Action Requests for non-conformities
that are beyond the scope of a single Dana
facility.
C. Notify Supplier of Corrective Action Request
Your organization’s identified Customer
Representative will be notified of the CAR. If
your organization has not identified its
Customer Representative, the highest ranking
official on file will become the default
Customer Representative of your organization.
This notification includes additional
requirements for containment, material
identification and response timing. Should an
OEM format for containment results be required,
the initiator of the Corrective Action Request
is responsible to provide the appropriate
documents to your organization.
D. Initial Response and Containment
Implementation
Your organization is responsible for providing
the resources to implement effective containment
of the non-conformity. Evidence of containment
requires documentation of the results of
containment actions and shall be included in the
Corrective Action Report.
It is the responsibility of your organization
to update the Corrective Action Request and
provide an initial response within 24 hours of
notification.
Containment results shall include the results
from your organization’s current production
controls, dock-audits, and containment actions,
as well as all other Dana specified containment
requirements. Your organization is responsible
for completing the containment results section
of the Corrective Action Report or attaching the
appropriate OEM format for containment results
to the Corrective Action Report.
Where Restricted Shipping is required, Dana
Representatives will initiate the
Restricted
Shipping
process.
E. Measurement and Analysis to Validate Root
Cause(s) and Select Solutions
It is your organization’s responsibility to
confirm the root cause(s) of the problem
identified and select effective solutions to
eliminate the true root cause(s). There are
many potential tools to assist your organization
with this including (but not limited to);
brainstorming, capability (quality) index,
control chart, decision matrix, design
error-proofing / process mistake-proofing,
design of experiments, histogram, hypothesis
testing, linear regression analysis, run and
trend charts, and the design and process failure
mode effects analysis.
Although Dana does not prescribe a specific
root cause analysis method, your organization
shall demonstrate root cause validation on the
Corrective Action Report. Dana Representatives
are responsible to review the submitted root
cause validation. Where the measurement and
analysis plan does not clearly validate
the potential root cause(s), Dana may reject the
Corrective Action Report.
Where the root cause(s) have been effectively
validated, your organization is responsible for
proposing a plan to implement permanent
solutions and verify their effectiveness.
Supplier Development is responsible for
communicating the proposed plan to internal Dana
functions (such as Quality, Engineering and
Sales, as appropriate) to approve the initiation
of the proposed changes. Where proposed changes
impact the design of the product, an Engineering
Change Request shall be generated, referencing
the Corrective Action Request. (Note:
This is not an authorization to ship any product
that is not currently PPAP Approved by the Dana
Receiving Facility(s). Please reference Section
7.1.4 Change Control of the Dana Specific
Requirements)
If the proposed plan is rejected, your
organization is responsible for providing
alternative plans to provide conforming
material.
F. Execute Plan for Permanent Corrective Action
Once approved, your organization is responsible
for implementing the proposal. The Corrective
Action shall be updated by your organization to
indicate progress. Supplier Development shall
monitor the progress based on milestones on the
planned activities.
Where assistance is required to achieve the
plan, the plan cannot be implemented as defined
or will not solve the original problem, your
organization shall notify Supplier Development
before due dates are compromised.
G. Verify Effectiveness of Permanent Solution
and System Changes
Your organization is responsible for providing
evidence of the effectiveness of the permanent
solutions to prevent or control the root cause(s)
of the non-conformity. This evidence shall be
included in the Corrective Action Report. Where
the evidence provided does not clearly indicate
the problem has been solved, your organization
shall be notified to include additional or more
comprehensive evidence.
Your organization shall include the updates to
their Failure Mode and Effects Analysis as part
of the evidence in the Corrective Action Report.
If concerns persist after permanent corrective
actions have been implemented, your organization
will be issued another Corrective Action Request
for repeat failure modes. These types of
corrective actions are elevated for regional and
corporate attention and place your organization
on Restricted Shipping II Status. 'Suppliers
with ineffective problem solving processes will
be subject to applicable Dana Supplier
Development processes and controls as required
to ensure the quality of products in compliance
with all other contract requirements.'
H. System Wide Deployment
Your organization is responsible for identifying
areas in their organization that may share
similar process characteristics (failure modes)
that may benefit from the permanent corrective
actions applied in response to a known
non-conformity.
I. Standard Charge-back for Non-Conformance
The following charge back amounts will be
applied when reconciling costs of a Supplier
Corrective Action. Your organization is
responsible for the inspection and containment
activities associated with non-conformances or
poor performance. These costs should not be
deemed to be exclusive. Your organization shall
be responsible for any other costs attributable
to a corrective action, whether or not set forth
below.
|
Type of Charge |
($USD) |
|
Standard charge-back for administration |
$ 150.00 |
|
Charges for all defective material |
Actual |
|
Charges for all scrap, rework and
containment expenses incurred for material
scrapped due to non-conformance (assemblies) |
Actual |
|
Charges for any cost incurred from warranty
(including OE Warranty Agreement charges) |
Actual |
|
Charges for all costs related to supplier
pass-through characteristics from Dana’s
customers |
Actual |
|
Charges for all costs related to late
delivery (including expedited freight
charges, and customer charges) |
Actual |
|
Charges for launch failures and spills /
line stoppages (at Dana and our customers) |
Actual |
|
Charges for inspection costs (including
gauges, set-up, training and labor costs) |
Actual |
|
Charges for Dana resources sent to the
Supplier to address non-conformance |
Actual |
|
Additional charge for late or unacceptable
containment response |
$ 75.00 |
|
Additional charge for late or unacceptable
root cause analysis |
$ 75.00 |
|
Additional charge for repeat non-conformance
(failure mode) |
$ 150.00 |
|
Additional charge for customer pass-through
characteristic that reaches our customers |
$ 150.00 |
|
Actual - actual charges to be documented in
SCAR and/or debit memo |
V1.6
|